Medical and scientific associations: specialist-reviewed
Managing patient-identifiable material in conference workflows
Case presentations, images and recordings can carry patient information into places the clinical team never intended, such as shared drives, slide decks and recordings.
Opens WhatsApp with a draft you can edit before sending. Nothing is sent automatically.
The short answer
Whether material is identifiable, whether consent exists and what the law and the institution require are questions for the presenting clinician's institution, the association's ethics or privacy lead and, where needed, a qualified adviser. The organiser's task is to find every place material travels and make sure a named person has cleared it before it moves on.
Map the workflow from submission to archive, mark each step where patient material could be present, and add a clearance field and a handling rule to each step.
What the organiser decides and what it routes
The organiser decides where files are stored, who can open them and when they are deleted. The organiser does not decide whether a case image is sufficiently anonymised or whether consent is adequate.
Those questions go to the presenter's institution and the association's responsible person. Record the answer, the name of the person who gave it and the date.
Where patient material can enter the workflow
- Abstract and case-report submissions, including attachments.
- Speaker slides, images and video clips sent by email or chat.
- Shared drives and file transfer links with open access.
- Reviewer packs and committee emails.
- Printed programmes, posters and e-posters.
- Live recording, streaming and social media posting from the room.
- Photography and audience questions that mention a case.
- Proceedings, on-demand libraries and archives after the event.
- Translation and design vendors who receive slide files.
A handling sequence
- Ask the association's responsible person for the written rule on patient material in submissions and presentations, and for its approver.
- Add a plain statement to the call for abstracts and speaker brief that identifiable patient material must be cleared by the presenter's institution before it is sent.
- Give every file a named owner and a clearance status in the materials register.
- Restrict file-sharing links to named recipients and set a deletion date.
- Tell AV, recording and design vendors in writing which files may be handled and which may not.
- Decide in advance what happens if a presenter or delegate shows uncleared material in the room, and brief the moderator.
- Close the register after the event with a record of what was deleted and what was kept.
Questions for the competent party
Ask your association's privacy or ethics lead and, where relevant, your legal adviser: which law and institutional rules apply to the material in our programme, what counts as identifiable for our members' fields, what consent or approval must be in place, who may approve release, how long may files be kept and who must be told if material is shared in error. Confirm the current Malaysian requirements from the authority's own published guidance rather than from a summary.
Worked example · Fictional example
A fictional imaging society meeting
Fictional organisation and figures, for illustration only.
The fictional Persatuan Pengimejan Contoh receives 60 abstracts, 14 with images. The committee's ethics lead says that each presenter must confirm clearance from their own institution and asks the secretariat to record it.
The secretariat adds a clearance column to the materials register. Two speakers send slides by chat; the files are moved to a restricted folder and the chat copies removed. The recording vendor is told in writing that sessions 5 and 9 are not to be recorded until clearance is confirmed.
After the event the register shows what was deleted and when.
Use this yourself
Patient-material workflow register
Copy this table. Add one row per workflow step where material could travel.
| Workflow step | Material type | Where stored or sent | Who has access | Cleared by (name and role) | Rule cited | Deletion date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open the tool: Conference materials and translation-version checker
Handle it in-house, or bring in help?
Your team can usually handle this when
- No case material in the programme, and a short rule already published to presenters.
- One file location and few vendors.
- A clear person at the association who answers clearance questions quickly.
Outside planning help earns its fee when
- Many abstracts and slide sets with images, and several vendors and reviewers handling files.
- Material is travelling through chat, email and shared drives without a register.
- Recordings or on-demand libraries are planned and the clearance rule is unclear.
Need the file workflow held together?
A conference project lead can map where material travels, set up the register and restricted file locations with your team, brief vendors and moderators on the committee's rules and chase clearance records from presenters. Clearance decisions and legal questions stay with your institutions, ethics lead and qualified advisers. Send your submission process and vendor list to scope the work.
Questions organisers ask
Can the organiser judge whether an image is anonymous?
No. That judgement belongs to the presenter's institution and the association's responsible person.
Should slides be collected by email?
Use a controlled upload with named access if your association's rule permits it, and ask the responsible person.
What about recordings?
Agree in writing, per session, which may be recorded and published. Confirm clearance before recording starts.
Who is told if material is shared in error?
Ask your responsible person in advance who must be notified and by when, and put it in the vendor brief.
Related resources
Content record: Draft. Written from the cited sources and checked by automated rules; not yet independently reviewed.